 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-10-2009, 12:17 PM
|
#21 |
|
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
Thanks, IMC.
Steven, Probably the new EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS as walk about len and a 60mm macro len or 100mm macro len for aquatic photography. |
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 08:36 AM
|
#22 |
 AFC Committee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,104
|
thx boss...
read somewhere... got ppl say if wan 18-135 might as well get the 18-200... y har? D24 
__________________
For Hobbyists..... By Hobbyists..... |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 10:37 AM
|
#23 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
Bro, I think 18 - 200 is Nikon.
Hear say, D90 quite good, of course D300 better
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:37 PM
|
#24 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,712
|
18-135 is the latest EFS lens.
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=19085  18-200 is older. http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=17518 
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:42 PM
|
#25 | |
 Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,384
|
Quote:
heading for D300s soon ... 51 AF points is goody ...
__________________
*All postings are personal representations with no association to AF's Management* "Huo Dao Lao Xue Dao Lao" Knowledge shall I seek till wither Photography Gallery http://www.watchsg.com |
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:43 PM
|
#26 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
oopss..
hey, I saw Sotong looking into this thread now.. C'mon Chris, tell us abt Nikon. 
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:47 PM
|
#27 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
Quote:
Just as I was saying... you beat me by posting liao  7D with 19 AF already damn good liao.. D300 with 51 AF is super cool !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:52 PM
|
#28 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,384
|
Quote:
- Nikon Macro 105mm VR ... heavy ... take endlers or tetras will faint .. - Nikon Macro 60mm adult aros perfect .. smaller fellas .. very hard ... - Tamron macro 90mm ... light, easy to hold ... dun have VR leh ... I'm using Tamron 17-50 F2.8 for most shots - Tried Nikon 18-55 F2.8 ... too heavy ... sold it away ... sharpness is not exagerating over tamron ... but colours r slightly more vibrant ... PP can settle it ... Tele lenses - Nikons are still better than 3rd parties .... 70-200 VR ... dun have built in tripod collar ... i usually use the collar as grips for firmer grip at 200mm end ... - 80-200 F2.8 has built in collar ... but M-A switch is known to be brittle ... but I seldom use M ... so not an issue for me ..
__________________
*All postings are personal representations with no association to AF's Management* "Huo Dao Lao Xue Dao Lao" Knowledge shall I seek till wither Photography Gallery http://www.watchsg.com |
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:59 PM
|
#29 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
What is the minimum focal distance for your 17-50 ? I believed it work well in LFS when space is a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 12:59 PM
|
#30 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,384
|
Quote:
I love Nikon lights and ED glasses ... so either camps ... u cant be wrong ... Most people talked about glass and body ... how about accessories like filters? - B+W CPL versus Hoya HMC HD CPL (Slim) Image quality near identical ... the later is costlier and supposely harder than B+W ... slim version as well ... B+W CPL KSM is beyond reach of most people ...
__________________
*All postings are personal representations with no association to AF's Management* "Huo Dao Lao Xue Dao Lao" Knowledge shall I seek till wither Photography Gallery http://www.watchsg.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Linear Mode
