|
02-11-2005, 08:52 AM | #71 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
hehe ... i all along thught that it is bubbling strongly throughout the 4 wks... only get abit smaller hehe.... |
|
02-11-2005, 11:22 AM | #72 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
WAHAHAA... no la not possible one...
But strill pretty reasonable lah for the first 3 weeks. |
02-11-2005, 03:09 PM | #73 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I use uncooked rice.
Just about 2 pinches of yeast. I'm using airstone cuz I broke my glass diffuser haha.. but it's the same. |
02-11-2005, 09:28 PM | #74 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It seems air stones require lesser pressure but the buibbles are less fine as well... since less pressure is required the bubbling probably should last longer. Any experience on this?
|
02-11-2005, 09:51 PM | #75 | |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
|
|
02-11-2005, 10:00 PM | #76 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well... finer bubbles results in greater and more effecient dissolving of the CO2 mah... the finest I've tried are the ceramic diffusers. A higher air pressure however is needed to force the bubbles out for ceramic diffusers. Can't get best of both worlds.
|
02-11-2005, 11:54 PM | #77 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Actually i feel that an airstone is gd enough hehee
my plants bubbles well with my airstone co2 hehe.... some more less pressure required for initial bubbling... hehe |
03-11-2005, 12:16 AM | #78 | |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
|
|
03-11-2005, 02:32 AM | #79 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yup yup I'm using the normal rough surface airstone.. tried wood airdiffuser before but large bubbles were produced instead..... less effective.
|
03-11-2005, 11:17 AM | #80 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
in my opinion the small cylindrical shape one is better... as for the round type... i think the pores bigger and angle not very gd... buble only come out from one spot then bubbles also bigger (mayb observation is due to i didnt place it properly hehe) |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|