|
04-12-2009, 12:56 AM | #41 |
Prof SK Ong
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,641
|
My first exposure to what was claimed a PG was 1977 in a relative's tank. Only seen 2 WC PG during my childhood.
__________________
Just because it's a bad idea doesn't mean it won't be a good time. Use imgur for your photos sharing https://play.google.com/store/apps/d...m.imgur.mobile |
04-12-2009, 01:18 AM | #42 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
04-12-2009, 12:19 PM | #43 |
Dragon
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 743
|
PG, I believe existed in the past. Now, Pahang river quite likely no more already probably due to over capturing of the said species due to it's traits and the value associated to it.
However, what PG may be left may probably be kept by various breeders and outcrossed to develop other strains to gold that it has become extremely difficult to lay hands on the true breed PG. In fact, the current golds may even be better than the traditional PG due to advance breeding practices in enhancing the gold. |
04-12-2009, 04:45 PM | #44 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's possible in the hands of a skilled breeder to build a strain of xbacks that are consistently of top quality, but it will probably be over several years. Selective breeding can give you that capture of the desirable genes over a large population, ie you can have a whole group of aros with attributes of a PG rather than one or two outstanding ones.
|
05-12-2009, 12:21 AM | #45 |
Dragon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,038
|
That's interest me too ............... I'm keeping a King Kong Pahang Gold
The one n only left with me. It's been 2 yrs since & still think the gold intensity still pretty georgeous. |
05-12-2009, 06:06 PM | #46 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Two years is early, from my own experience it's the crossing first that develops, and as the fish age, the gold becomes more and more intense.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|