|
16-10-2007, 02:36 AM | #131 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Waterzoo. So which do you think is most suitable for aros?
Octane - how long it takes to wash the Denitrator unit? It should be quite light, since there are mostly bioballs? Atom - how do you interpret the ORP readings? |
16-10-2007, 03:15 AM | #132 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hmmmm tough question.
IMO, 0 to -50mV - Too little or no anearobe -50mV to -150mV - limited denitrification -151 to -199mV - average denitrification -200 to -280mV - optimum denitrification -281 to -330mV - anaerobe begins to switch partly to sulphate -350 and below - optimum hydrogen sulfide production. |
16-10-2007, 11:27 AM | #133 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
My apologies for not bringing the message clearly. What I meant was five years ago Deltec sulphur filter doesn't have a provision for ORP probe as I was then exploring for a alternative nitrate filter for my aro tank which was bombarded with about 80ppm of NO3. This was after abandoning my CIYed coil denitrator as it was a pain in the neck with feeding as well as ensuring constant flow driprate at the output coupled to my regular business trips. Then opted for the NR1000 which I got initial success in the beginning as I didn't want to purchase the proprietary threaded ORP which the unit is designed for. However, understand that the threaded attachment is available for standard ORP probe which is good for the users who wants to use their brand of choice for the probe. Even explored the latest range of Deltec Nitrate Filter but again they needs "feeding" and unless you have a very strict regiment of performing such a task then it is another good option. But then knowing myself that I will enter into a self denial mode which I felt the best option is to adopt the Schuran Nitrate Filter which needs no feeding. |
|
16-10-2007, 12:54 PM | #134 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All sulphur based denitrator do not require any feeding because the feeding is the sulphur itself.
|
16-10-2007, 01:08 PM | #135 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I thought there are two alternatives mentioned by Sunburst, one with siporax, fed with vodka?
Will readings below -350mV be considered important, the lower it is, the worst it has gotten? If it hits -330mV, there is danger to fish life? |
16-10-2007, 02:15 PM | #136 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
If the readings on the ORP hits -300mV, bad things are brewing! Some examples: - Hydrogen Sulfide. Very toxic and bad smell. Bad for humans too! - Heavy slime. Increase the DOC of tank and lower the oxidising power of the water in the tank. - Choking and thus reduce or even stop the flow at the output - Denitrification will be reduce too - Nitrite and Ammonia might develope. - Development of pathogens. From the above, nothing is good for the lives stock. |
|
16-10-2007, 03:23 PM | #137 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
If you hate feeding then it is best to use methods available in the market other than the Denitrator Filter System. |
|
16-10-2007, 03:25 PM | #138 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
16-10-2007, 07:28 PM | #139 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Consequently, they continuously break down nitrate, and the aquarium water remains low in nitrate. Relating to -350mV registers for the Denitrator reactor chamber, the chance of seeing any livestocks in the tank is very very slim and be prepared to do a complete makeover for the tank. |
|
16-10-2007, 08:08 PM | #140 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
This is what I do. - Let the output goes to a protein skimmer - Use ozone for the air-inlet to protein skimmer - Filter the output from protein skimmer using wool. Addtional process; use GAC in FR to remove excess DOC. |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|