Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums  

Go Back   Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums > The Guildhouse > Chatterbox > Singapore Politics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2018, 11:30 PM   #1
stargazer
Dragon
 
stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 877
Default 'Ministers are not paid enough', says Goh Chok Tong: reports

Cut ministerial pay and the government will end up recruiting “very, very mediocre people” as office-holders, said Emeritus Senior Minister (ESM) Goh Chok Tong in a dialogue with South East District residents last Thursday (2 August).

“I am telling you the ministers are not paid enough, and down the road, we are going to get a problem with getting people to join the government, because civil servants now earn more than ministers,” said Goh. “Now we dare not pay ministers a good wage.”

“To any one of us here, $1 million is a lot of money. So where do you want to get your ministers from? From people who earn only $500,000 a year, whose capacity is $500,000 a year? So (when) I look for ministers, anybody who wants to be paid more than half a million, I won’t take him. You are going to end up with very very mediocre people, who can’t even earn a million dollars outside to be our minister. Think about that. Is it good for you, or is it worse for us in the end?”

The 77-year-old added that he had asked two potential candidates who were earning $5-10 million to stand in the 2015 General Election but they declined.

According to The Online Citizen (TOC) and The Straits Times, Goh was responding to a suggestion by Braddell Heights resident Abdul Aziz, 70, that ministerial salaries be cut to fund pensions for elderly people. A recording of the conversation was posted by social news site MustShareNews.com, and Goh’s staffers later provided TOC with a transcript of the exchange.

The former Prime Minister went on to cite the example of Senior Minister of State for Law and Health Edwin Tong, 48, who was a senior partner at law firm Allen and Gledhill when approached to take up his current position. Tong was earning more than $2 million annually as a senior counsel and now earns $500,000 per year, said Goh.

According to the ESM, “(Tong) said, at this stage of his life, he has got a house, he has got a mother-in-law to support, a father-in-law to support, his own parents and so on, what should he do?

“So I asked him, ‘Edwin, what are you in politics for?’ He said, ‘Here to serve.’ So I said, ‘Well, you know between $2 million and perhaps half a million, later on you hopefully become a full minister, $1 million, you have to decide which is more important.’

“He said, ‘Yes, I will take it on.’ And he felt very strongly that he could do the job.”

A controversial issue

The annual pay of political appointment-holders consists of five components: Monthly salary, 13th month bonus, Annual Variable Component (AVC) based on Singapore’s economic performance, performance bonus and a national bonus based on four socio-economic indicators.

The latter bonus can range from zero to six months, with good performers typically given three months.

Currently, the annual salary of an MR4 grade (entry level) minister stands at $1.1 million, while the Prime Minister earns $2.2 million. This is based on the assumption of an AVC of one month, good individual performance and the national bonus indicators being met.

In March, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean told Parliament that the government would maintain ministerial salaries at their current level.

“The economy is going through a period of transition and the government has decided to watch the changing economic conditions and outlook further, rather than making any refinements now,” said the 63-year-old, who is also Minister-in-charge of the Civil Service.

In 2017, a committee formed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong found that the existing salary framework remains “relevant and sound”. It did, however, recommended a pay rise of 9 per cent along with “fine-tuning of the national bonus conditions” to take into consideration changing economic conditions and national outlook, said Teo.

The recommended increase was to match the respective rise in the salary benchmark for an MR4-grade minister, which is currently set as the median income of the top 1,000 earners who are Singapore citizens.

The current total annual salary of an entry level Minister (i.e. MR4) is benchmarked to 60% of the median income of the top 1,000 earners who are Singapore Citizens.

In 2007, ministerial salaries were increased by some 60 per cent.
stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2018, 11:32 PM   #2
stargazer
Dragon
 
stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 877
Default

Do you believe he said that?

Earn $100 k a month and still said underpaid?
stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 12:59 AM   #3
wllm33
Dragon
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,667
Default

thats why we are so poor duh
wllm33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 11:16 AM   #4
millenium
Senior Dragon
 
millenium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,492
Default

They are Gods.
millenium is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 01:23 PM   #5
stargazer
Dragon
 
stargazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 877
Default

I think it is an insult to the many volunteers who spend their time in social activities welfare without getting any fees.
stargazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 02:22 PM   #6
lenghan
Arofanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 70
Default

Corporate world indeed makes more $$$$
If they are truly focused on serving the nation, $$$$ should never ever be any issue.
No one is begrudging them that they should be compensated for their sacrifices.
But alas.....we have the highest paid cabinet ministers in the entire world!!
And they still think they are under paid????
It is tantamount to serving TWO masters....money and politics???
But I guess as long as they are still holding on to 70% of the votes, why not, since they have the mandate from the majority??
lenghan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 03:50 PM   #7
millenium
Senior Dragon
 
millenium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lenghan View Post
Corporate world indeed makes more $$$$
If they are truly focused on serving the nation, $$$$ should never ever be any issue.
No one is begrudging them that they should be compensated for their sacrifices.
But alas.....we have the highest paid cabinet ministers in the entire world!!
And they still think they are under paid????
It is tantamount to serving TWO masters....money and politics???
But I guess as long as they are still holding on to 70% of the votes, why not, since they have the mandate from the majority??
Not all of them. Maybe 10% make more if stay outside. They do have a choice if they want to serve or not.
millenium is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 11:09 PM   #8
onlyyouknow
Senior Dragon
 
onlyyouknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,148
Default

So all the ministers that we have can earn a lot more if they choose the corporate route?
onlyyouknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2018, 11:12 PM   #9
hkh
Arofanatic
 
hkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 113
Default

I'm not surprised as his wife, the Former NKF patron Tan Choo Leng, sparked outrage when she remarked that T.T Durai's pay of "S$600,000 a year is peanuts".........
hkh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2018, 11:38 AM   #10
foxwagon
Dragon
 
foxwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,181
Default

$2m per year.

No wonder so many students want to study law.
foxwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Arofanatics.com (Since 30th August 2000)