View Single Post
Old 28-02-2014, 09:55 AM   #27
globalcookie
Dragon
 
globalcookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcchia View Post
These 60.1% lived well with it and think of their families future ..........
The other 39.9% wants more and had to endour with it .............
Gd for you.

Btw what is endour?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutx View Post
I've no issue with them increasing the TC as this is a pass-on cost, TC cannot subside the service, people work inside, contractors servicing the contract will be benefited......BUT...why TC need to keep the reserve for investment?

They should be a Zero base organisation or the most few mths up to 1 yr running cost reserve!!!
Like you mentioned in the end, the cash holding shd be maybe up to 1 year, not by many millions that they squandered and burnt it on some investments blindly.

Increase in cost, ok we need transparancy. They want to talk abt cost, they show us the geniune P&L. We used to see more cleaners, locals. Now we hardly see, as there are very few cleaners, and mostly foreigners. They had cut a lot of cost too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by therat View Post
Out of the eight town councils that are raising S&CC, six had not increased the charges for a decade.
Sounds so noble...

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkh View Post
What puzzle me is that Jurong TC had last raised their charges in 2010........and now raise together with other TCs ??
Must follow, regardless!
globalcookie is offline   Reply With Quote