View Single Post
Old 23-05-2004, 01:51 AM   #57
Navyblue
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devilfire
bro, u stil dun understand. it's NOT the high vel n low press tat draws the air..

after these lengthy debate, i think i understand u more. i think u like 2 understand things 2 the fullest.

like u said, u r not engineer trained. i was n i took almost 6mths 2 fully understand tis theory. on the surface, it sounds simple. but there r still many factors 2 consider.

many times during my course of training, ppl often get mix up wif weight n mass, pressure n force, torque n horsepower, speed n velocity, volume n flowrate.........

ur pt of view is right, in a lay-man term. but 2 a professional, it need more detail explanation.

tat is y i told jeff i would explain in simplicity. n it has been yrs since i touch on tis theory, n tat is y i believe i has forgotten some of the principles behind it.

think we shd stop here, we r going further n further away. we r going out of topic.

anyway, good 2 hav a debator like u ard. it's fun n ppl will learn more things.

cheers
Well though I am not from the engineering field, I come from science field, and know the difference between weight n mass, pressure n force, torque n horsepower, speed n velocity, volume n flowrate.........

Yes I agree we should stop hehe ... I think debate in theory is a moot because there is no way for us to know is the flow too much for the venturi, we don't know to what extend that the manufacturer overstate or understate the flow requirement. Thus only one thing here that can proves the fact, that is by experiment. I got better skimmate and bubble production when using more flow which speaks for itself, and do not see any bottle neck effect on bubble production as more flow is used.

Bro bonjour2, sorry for the off topic
  Reply With Quote